Notary Homepage. Back Co-habitation. Back Arrangements for Children. Back Adoption. Back Residential Property. Back Birth Injury Claims. Contact us today For a free initial conversation call William Ford Read more. Notary Notary Public Services. Cohabitation Disputes Financial Arrangements. Arrangements for Children Child Protection. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
Ok Learn more. And of course, the same process was repeated in respect of every other activity - where the client said he had no difficulty, this was accepted at face value. Then those things he had stated he could accomplish without difficulty were used as evidence in the Functional History to suggest there should be no difficulty with those activities where he had indicated difficulty. Await the Review report with baited breath. Whilst the qualifying criteria are different the DLA and PIP outcomes should be comparable - after all its still the same person being assessed.
A typical example: client had DLA hrcc and lrmc - enduring mental illness - organic delusional schizophrenia-like disorder. History of frequent detentions under the Mental Health Act.
Extensive medical evidence provided at consultation and oral evidence given by CPN. This evidence not recorded on PA4. This evidence is not referred to in the original or MR decision notice. No reference to this evidence in HCP or decision makers reasoning. No mention of previous DLA award. Awarded 7 points Daily Living and 4 points Mobility. Spending quite a long time responding to the PIP consultation. For me the issue is that we can take an age reproducing anecdote after anecdote but they are dismissed.
Ultimately what needs to be addressed is a cultural issue. Certainly at our TUGs the implication has been that TS should be independent so to flag up poor HCP style reports would require them to also flag up poor reports from GPs, consultants etc. In most cases one is kicking at an open door with tribunals.
Very hard for a medical professional sitting on a panel to publicly say so and obviously some will have a problem with the basic concept of anyone in their profession being wrong full stop. Firstly, the software is adapted insurance software. There is, for example, no provision for showing that more than one activity under a descriptor is applicable.
Guidance overview: Medical guidance for DLA decision makers child cases : staff guide. Request an accessible format. If you use assistive technology such as a screen reader and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email accessible.
Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use. Printed versions of this guide are not available. Why we publish this guide We publish this guide to help people understand how we make decisions.
Information for claimants See www. Brexit Check what you need to do. Explore the topic Carers and disability benefits Benefits and financial help Health conditions. Is this page useful? Maybe Yes this page is useful No this page is not useful. Thank you for your feedback.
0コメント