Donald Houston Acrisius as Acrisius. Vida Taylor Danae as Danae. Desmond Davis. More like this. Watch options. Storyline Edit. Soon Perseus is off on one quest after another, with Zeus helping, Thetis hindering, and lots of innocent bystanders getting stabbed, drowned, and squished. An Epic Entertainment Spectacular!
Action Adventure Family Fantasy. Did you know Edit. Trivia Despite being listed on posters and having main title billing, Ursula Andress only has one line in the entire film. Goofs As the destruction of Argos begins, heavy winds blow the tunic of a man pulling a donkey on a rope to reveal a pair of modern-day gym shorts underneath. Quotes Ammon : I was partial to tragedy in my youth.
Crazy credits In the closing credits, the cast is divided into three categories: The Immortals for the gods of Olympus , The Mortals humans, etc. Those 8 are the non-human animated characters supplied by special effects. Alternate versions The UK cinema release was cut by the BBFC to secure an 'A' rating and removed the closeup shot of Calibos' trident-hand piercing a man's back, as well as shortening the prolonged shots of Calibos on his knees writhing in agony after a sword has been thrown into his stomach.
Connections Edited into Malcolm in the Middle User reviews Review. Top review. The Definitive Harryhausen?
Perseus must battle both Medusa and the Kraken to save the Princess Andromeda. Anyone who loves fantasy or classic genre film knows Ray Harryhausen and loves his work. Never will you ever hear, "That Harryhausen! What a rube! And what a film! Certainly epic in scope, it is possibly the best Greek myth captured on film. I mean, really, what even comes close? Those endless cruddy Hercules movies? Nope "Jason and the Argonauts"? Quotes Zeus : Release the Kraken! Crazy credits There are no opening credits.
Alternate versions Also released in a 3D version. Connections Edited into Yoostar 2: In the Movies User reviews Review. Top review. Plenty of CGI and noise fills the time left by an absence of anything else.
The original film is a nostalgic mix of mechanical owls, Division One footballer haircuts and lumbering beasts in my head — no more than that.
I'm sure if you put me on the spot to comment on it I would have fond things to say but perhaps this is only due to the passage of time. Perhaps the original Clash of the Titans was nothing more than a rather wooden effects movie like this remake is — but yet for some reason the film is given praise for it and this remake was battered for doing just that. Well, I don't have enough memory to be able to compare and contrast so I will just focus on what I watched last night. It is just what it suggests it will be by producing endless CGI beasts and effects in one serviceable action sequence after another.
I only saw it in 2D 3D still not really attracting me but I have to admit that the size of the creatures and so on was impressive even if only in terms of being to see all that money up there on the screen. Of course this is not the same as saying as the film is particularly good — because it isn't really - it is only "OK".
Part of the problem is that it is a very hollow movie; everything looks pretty good on the surface of it technically, but there is nothing below this. I'm not suggesting that the film must be some worthy epic with layering and character depth, but to be honest I would have settled for a bit of fun or a bit of actual excitement rather than just lots of things to look at.
As it is though the film is all about the effects and nothing else is really forthcoming. You can see this in the cast — not so much their names because there are some big names in here but more in their performances. Worthington is a solid actor and good looking guy — that is what he brings to the table and in this film he probably does enough with that. Neeson and Fiennes have nothing to do — Fiennes in particular looks awkward and uneasy with his character and it is clear this film is a "job" to him rather than a project.
Flemyng is OK under all that makeup while Atherton is pretty but pointless. None of this is a surprise though, it is not a film for actors but rather for effects. Clash of the Titans is a shrug of a film. If you are looking for undemanding noise that will not tax you one bit mentally but will provide big creatures and spectacle to stare at then this will do the job.
It won't do the job particularly well, but it will do it and then move on — you'll have forgotten it within a week though as generally it doesn't have much special or of interest about it. FAQ Is "Clash of the Titans" based on a book? Who are the Titans? How similar is the remake to the original? Details Edit. Release date April 2, United States.
All this publication's reviews. Extreme Gamer. Depending on your expectations, Clash is likely going to disappoint, and even with all its heart and extra features, the core mechanics are slightly dated, which brings the action down a notch.
Eurogamer Portugal. The negative aspects are rather abundant in Clash of the Titans, so this isn't something recommendable, unless you are really fans of hack n slash and no longer have anything to play.
Game Informer. The recent Clash of the Titans film was a mildly entertaining display of special effects. The game contains all of the film's camp but lacks the spectacle of million-dollar CG krakens to help save it. Gaming Nexus. With so many better games out there, don't waste your time. User Reviews. Write a Review. Positive: 1 out of 4. Mixed: 0 out of 4. Negative: 3 out of 4.
Really enjoyable game.
0コメント